Utah Eagle Forum
  • Home
  • Our principles
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Join us
    • Alerts
  • 2023 Convention
  • Donate
  • Eagle Eye Blog
  • Teen Eagles & Interns
  • Contact your legislator
  • Our team
  • National Eagle Forum
  • Utah Pro-Life Coalition

The Eagle Eye Blog

Abortion lobby takes aim at parental rights

8/13/2019

Comments

 
Picture
Written by Ryan Neuhaus, August 13, 2019. Originally published in the Washington Examiner

Recently, a coalition of 75 organizations including Planned Parenthood, National LGBTQ Task Force, the ACLU, and the National Abortion Federation released a 116-page blueprint outlining a policy agenda aimed at advancing policies for women and children in the name of “sexual and reproductive health care, rights, and justice.” However, after reading over the policies, one quickly realizes that they would substantially harm American families without bringing forth "rights" or "justice." 

Parental rights, for example, are targeted for elimination. The coalition deemed parental consent for an abortion as detrimental to the empowerment of “girls and youth assigned female.” 

If the true goal of the coalition is to help empower young women, shouldn’t they encourage young women to look to their mothers, their families, or at least an experienced adult such as a judge for guidance in potentially intense and emotional times? After all, considering that adult engagement is required for getting your ears pierced or taking an aspirin at school, surely making a life-ending decision such as abortion is worth a conversation with someone who isn’t going to profit from it.

Cutting out mothers seems like the most glaring oversight of all.

“Of all familial relationships, the mother–daughter one is most likely to remain important for both parties, even when major life changes occur,” write the authors of a study led by Kathryn Bojczyk of Florida State University. “Multiple theoretical perspectives recognize the mother–daughter bond as lifelong, intimate, and developmentally important.”
​

Distancing a mother’s guidance regarding the health and well-being of their children is terrible policy.

Research conducted by Paula Goodwin of Purdue University and Osman Galal of UCLA has shown that traditional family structures have positioned women to directly impact the overall health and well-being of their families. If the true intent of pro-abortion activists were to provide healthcare to women, while respecting and valuing women, taking mothers out of the decision-making process alongside their children would be viewed as irresponsible, as it devalues motherhood and endangers adolescent women. 

Good policy would uphold parental and adult engagement laws, as mothers and fathers are at the heart of a child’s education and healthcare. And parents will be the ones helping pick up the pieces when things go wrong. Judicial bypass laws also at least ensure that someone with the child’s interest in mind is looking at the needs of all. 

Perhaps the abortion lobby’s desire to cut out parents has to do with the fact that they want unrestricted access to minors to make an abortion sale. The substantive work of Dr. Michael New has shown conclusively that when a state passes a law ensuring that parents are involved in the decision, the overall statewide rate of abortion decreases by an estimated 13.6%.

Abortion has harmed millions of women across the United States. Often portrayed as a safe medical practice, abortion has been found to scar the lining of the uterus, damage the cervix and other internal organs, lead to eating disorders, depression, suicidal thoughts, and even death. Complications from botched surgeries have resulted in hysterectomies, ending girls' chances ever to have children of their own later in life.

The overriding problem with the healthcare proposal coming from abortion advocates is a fundamental disagreement over what constitutes healthcare. Pregnancy is not a disease cured by abortion. Pushing an agenda that distills all women’s interests down to the presence or absence of abortion ignores needs for economic advancement, access to education, or a level playing field in the law. 

A blueprint for healthcare that values and strengthens the lives of mothers and children is a good idea. It won’t be achieved if we cut the ties between adults and children. The real question is who can be better trusted to help a child make an abortion decision, the people who have devoted their lives to a child, or the people whose goal is to make a sale? 

Ryan Neuhaus is Students for Life of America’s Florida Regional Coordinator.
Comments

    Author

    Volunteers of Utah Eagle Forum. 

    Archives

    January 2023
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    August 2021
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Article V Convention
    Child Abuse
    Conversion Therapy
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Deseret News
    DOJ
    Education
    ERA
    Fairness
    Founding Fathers
    Free Speech
    Gayle Ruzicka
    Hate Crimes
    Hero
    History
    Liberty Forum Event
    Religious Liberty
    Sacrifice
    Service
    Sex Education
    Socialism
    Taxes
    Title IX
    Transgender
    University Of Utah
    US Constitution
    Victory

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Contact us
Legislators
Facebook
Join us
Principles 
Instagram
Alerts
Our team
YouTube
Donate
National Eagle Forum
Eagle Eye Blog
  • Home
  • Our principles
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Join us
    • Alerts
  • 2023 Convention
  • Donate
  • Eagle Eye Blog
  • Teen Eagles & Interns
  • Contact your legislator
  • Our team
  • National Eagle Forum
  • Utah Pro-Life Coalition